The government on the surface of different departments are different

Nearly a year from the United States policy posture, U.S. policy and no fundamental change, is still "hedging its bets", just America's contact compatible with both hands in strengthening. The government on the surface of different departments are different, is roughly the jam, the state council coaxes, defense ChangBaiLian actually U.S. policy it sounds differentMBT Fanaka GTX,jam composed chorus.
American asia-pacific strategy to China challenge the surrounding environment. But the view from the sino-us relations on, we should fully understand the complexity of the sino-us relations in all over the world of the relations between big powers, the United States is unique among on China's future development direction, to China will how to use their are growing strength was not trust; China how to American concerns about China's and beware of China will ultimately, contain to what extent will also take isn't really the right word. Domestic scholars have will this state of sino-us relations called "mutual suspicions of interdependence". An American politician lamented that the United States has never between with a non Allies remain so close economic relations. In addition to close economic and trade relations, the outside MBT Habari, in the United Nations security council cooperation, terrorism, nuclear non-proliferation, energy, environment and issues to do with avian influenza and anti drug smuggling and so on a series of global issues between China and America have extensive common interests. And relations between China and the United States have transcended the pure intergovernmental relations, both contact, communication and cooperation has penetrated into every aspect of social life. The extensive relations between China and the United States based formed a kind of internal power between China and the United States is not that as long as the crucial question happened confrontational conflict, u.s.-china relations will automatically forward development.
U.s.-china relations in gradually mature, the so-called mature is relatively stable, and does not mean no conflict. Corresponding to this, the Chinese are taking a calm, pragmatic attitude view sino-us relations. In 2005 the sino-us relations opinion poll showed that although rates as high as the respondents 56.7% America does in containing China, at the same time for the satisfaction of sino-us relations but also as high as 70.9%. This shows that Chinese people in the United States, the so-called "containment" already inured to the weird, and recognize that America's "containment" could not prevent the pace of China forward, the future of China attitude more confident. (but xing enlightenment)

Second sino-japanese relations and northeast Asia security

In China's peripheral security environment, bilateral relations and the nuclear MBT Fora, issue constitutes two most difficult aspect, the two aspects of the development of the situation of Chinese security environment development situation is very important.

(a) intersection china-japan relations


(2) ZuoYouFengYuan Indian country strategy

1. The United States to Indian strategic approaches
In recent years, America and India's strategic close conspicuous. America's South Asia strategy is to make India can become a superpower, and also help Pakistan for security and stability. 1998 India beauty even once printed relations bottomed. In recent years, the United States highly valued India's geopolitical strategic value to make India into the United States,mbt shoes sale the global strategic framework. America and India's relationship, the two countries increase in political, economic, military and other fields of cooperation further. The cold war India though non-aligned banner, but hold the Soviet side actually stood. Since the 1990s, India foreign strategy, although an important change in multilateral diplomacy as the goal, but the key to beauty partners in foreign policy.
In early 2006, the American President's visit to India, is America and India a turning point in the relationship. In India, the United States drew at willing cause damage to global restrictions the risk of nuclear proliferation, and India boasts a "landmark" a nuclear agreement, formally recognized Indian nuclear status. The U.S. government to prevent proliferation as one of the primary goals of foreign policy, on one hand, harsh treatment of Iran and north Korea nuclear program, but, on the other hand, the behavior of India to ratification afterwards. This double standard practice, may cause those who are trying to have nuclear weapons believe, as long as nuclear weapons out sooner or later, the United States only a debt. And the United States for its this practice excuse unexpectedly is the so-called "democratic countries MBT Tariki, belonging to India," this statement to be convincing. Although U.S. officials publicly claimed that never put India as China against the power of India, but the United States by analysts thought to have this roping in China's intentions. The President of the United States the India trip though get India mainstream media universal praise, but in some people in India had different sound. Bush's trip to India during, tens of thousands of Indian people in new Delhi, mumbai, kolkata and hyderabad held rallies demonstrations, protests bush visit.
Even if the purpose of the United States and India alliance lurk curb China's intentions, India also not willing to play such a role. First of all because containing China does not accord with India's national interests; Second, India has always been an "soaring aspirations" country, although will first priority for beauty relationship at, but not like Japan that follow everywhere in America. Different from those who are anxious to prove his former eastern European countries, for a long time the non-aligned movement leaders in India will not pose the role of American pieces resigned. India's domestic powerful left-wing coalition and intellectuals of American hegemony and ways discontent, against the government and American go so close, these conditions from internal restricts the development of the relationship between America and India. India won't give up the route, the independent diplomacy with Russia, the United States, the European Union, China established relations, India's foreign seek is establishing a multilateral strategic partnership.

2. About the so-called "- the Russian - printed triangle alliance"
In recent years, "- the Russian - seal a triangle alliance" from multilateral cooperation idea being mentioned, caused numerous discussions. This idea was first PuLiMaKeFu Russian former prime minister in 1996, when the proposed background is in foreign affairs in Russian outfit that was American pressure to follow the western policy was deeply disappointed, thus has the obvious against western meaning. For many years, Russia has been actively advocates and the trilateral cooperation enabler. In July 2006, at the g8 summit in Moscow, Russia, China, India three leaders held official tripartite talks, it is the first time the Russian bear the g8 summit host to bring this session of many new things summit, the most compelling one, even by the media called the summit the following. Concern about the media and analysts to stir again the trianglar relations between the lenovo.
This paper argues that the three countries, from the current national interest, foreign strategy and the relationship between the look, three 792 leagues. The found of the alliance, or because they have need MBT Sirima,common major related interests defend, or are facing a common enemy. From the two aspects of watch, Russia, India, to possess an alliance conditions.
First is concerned, the three common interests to give each other's things are very limited. Russia and the United States have various despite major differences, but never to hostile. In the face of U.S. pressure between China and Russia, it is possible and necessary sees each other, but this is unlikely to alliance sees the degree. The tripartite "Russian arrange a closed-door meeting" form, do not eliminate more than substance to western "show" with the ingredients. In fact, since 2000, Russia's imagine also changed, no longer emphasize "strategic triangle", also do not speak "alliance", and carry three kingdoms cooperation. In China's case, since the end of the cold war, China has been seeking a peaceful development, advocate the foreign strategy is new-style partner relations and cooperation, and never advocate between the great powers alliance. India to trilateral cooperation mentality, India and Russia especially complex has good traditional relationships, and at the same time as "by the western world's largest democracy," which in the United States, Russia, ZuoYouFengYuan between can completely.
In fact the U.S. also has been co-opted India, while India will also be developing relations with the us put myself on the primary position of foreign strategy, with no need for Indian sparked between close American discontent. MBT Goti, Triangle alliance was not the most fundamental point is that three kingdoms are all aware of their respective national development need most funds, technology, market these factors not from each other, but from the u.s.-led western countries, which all not radically against western intrinsic motivation, but there are contrary with the United States and other western countries are in a stable relationship needs.